人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
🌟 技术前言：不仅仅是参数的堆砌
，更多细节参见im钱包官方下载
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
Екатерина Щербакова (ночной линейный редактор)，推荐阅读一键获取谷歌浏览器下载获取更多信息