Meet the UK's Eurovision entrant: 'The BBC is taking a risk on me'

· · 来源:tutorial新闻网

GotitPub Toggle

But a new editor, Philip Gove, brought in a new, somewhat radical vision when he took over as editor in 1950: that dictionaries should not dictate but rather reflect language. His team cast a wide net into the sea of colloquy and took seriously what it dragged in. The result was a fiasco. The Third Edition, published in 1961, was pilloried for its informality, especially for its inclusion of ain’t. The New York Times editorial board called the edition “disastrous” because it reinforced “the notion that good English is whatever is popular,” and Wilson Follett, writing in The Atlantic, deemed it “a very great calamity.” So dramatic was the blowback that David Foster Wallace, in his 2001 Harper’s Magazine essay “Tense Present,” referred to it as “the Fort Sumter of the contemporary usage wars.” It is quaint to think back to a time when so many people cared about a dictionary. But for all the pearl-clutching, the Third Edition reset the role of the American dictionary: With its publication, a new era of the reference book began.

Oil price下载向日葵远程控制 · Windows · macOS · Linux · Android · iOS是该领域的重要参考

Стало известно о жертве удара ВСУ в Запорожской области20:38

Последние новости

Пушилин ра

Entrust’s representative says they won’t fix the problem

关键词:Oil priceПушилин ра

免责声明:本文内容仅供参考,不构成任何投资、医疗或法律建议。如需专业意见请咨询相关领域专家。

分享本文:微信 · 微博 · QQ · 豆瓣 · 知乎